Learn the key differences between self-developed and third-party authentication systems in passkey adoption, including control, cost, and flexibility.
Vincent
Created: January 8, 2025
Updated: August 13, 2025
Explore our comprehensive guide to assess passkey-readiness in enterprise systems, improving security, user experience, and reducing SMS OTP costs.
Read the full articleRead by 5,000+ security leaders.
When adopting passkeys for user authentication, organizations must choose between self-developed systems and third-party authentication providers. Each approach has distinct advantages and challenges, which are outlined below:
Advantages:
Challenges:
60-page Enterprise Passkey Whitepaper:
Learn how leaders get +80% passkey adoption. Trusted by Rakuten, Klarna & Oracle
Advantages:
Challenges:
The choice depends on your organization’s priorities. If customization and data control are critical, a self-developed system might be the better fit. However, if speed and scalability are the main concerns, third-party providers offer a streamlined path to integrating passkeys.
For enterprises with hybrid setups, combining self-developed systems with third-party components can offer a balanced approach.
Explore our comprehensive guide to assess passkey-readiness in enterprise systems, improving security, user experience, and reducing SMS OTP costs.
Read the full articleRead by 5,000+ security leaders.