Get your free and exclusive +45-page Authentication Analytics Whitepaper

Corbado Observe · Experiments

Prove the login fix before you ship it

Every auth change raises the same two questions: did we break anything, and how hard can we push? Experiments answers both with a randomized A/B test on your real login traffic.

  • Completion lift per variant against control

  • Error-rate guardrail against silent breakage

  • Health check before you trust the result

Test the change instead of arguing it

The A/B test your login never got

Teams A/B test checkout buttons. The login ships on a hunch. Experiments brings the same discipline. Method Uplift shows where to start.

Did we break anything?

Proving the new thing better comes second. The error guardrail blocks a variant that wins completion but breaks more logins.

How hard can we push?

Auto-trigger the passkey prompt or let users start it? One dismissed dialog is lost conversion. Test both and ship the winner.

Is the result real?

Experiment health checks volume, traffic balance and sample-ratio mismatch. A bad split is flagged before it feeds you noise.

Experiments

From debate to decision

Modal, banner or inline prompt? Auto-trigger or user-initiated? Stop arguing in review meetings. Tag the variants and read the answer.

Completion lift against control, the error-rate guardrail and the probability that a variant truly wins. Experiment health flags volume, traffic balance and a bad split before you read any lift.

Experiments FAQ

Common questions about A/B testing authentication

Test your login like you test checkout

Your login is the highest-traffic funnel you own. Give it the same experiment discipline. Start by measuring your mix with Method Uplift.

  • Guardrail first: catch breakage before lift
  • Trustworthy reads: health checks built in
  • Read-only on top of your existing IdP