---
url: 'https://www.corbado.com/faq/diy-vs-outsourced-passkey-implementation'
title: 'How to decide between DIY & outsourced passkey approach?'
description: 'Explore the pros and cons of DIY vs. outsourced passkey implementation to decide the best approach for your organization.'
lang: 'en'
keywords: 'DIY passkey implementation, outsourced passkey solutions, passkey integration approach, passkey project planning'
---

# How to decide between DIY & outsourced passkey approach?

## How Can Organizations Decide Between a DIY and Outsourced Passkey Approach?

When implementing passkeys, organizations must choose between a **DIY (do-it-yourself)**
approach or outsourcing to a specialized provider. Each approach has advantages and
challenges that depend on the organization’s resources, expertise, and strategic
priorities.

### Pros and Cons of DIY Passkey Implementation

**Advantages:**

- **Full Control:** Organizations retain complete control over the system’s architecture
  and customization.
- **Integration Flexibility:** The system can be tailored to specific needs and seamlessly
  integrated with existing infrastructure.
- **Cost Savings (Long-Term):** For organizations with experienced in-house teams,
  long-term costs may be lower after the initial setup.

**Challenges:**

- **Resource-Intensive:** Requires significant internal resources, including skilled
  developers and project managers.
- **Higher Risk:** Lack of expertise in passkey systems can lead to technical challenges,
  delays, and security [vulnerabilities](https://www.corbado.com/glossary/vulnerability).
- **Slower Time-to-Market:** Internal development often takes longer, delaying the
  benefits of adoption.

### Pros and Cons of Outsourced Passkey Implementation

**Advantages:**

- **Expertise:** Access to specialized providers ensures a secure and compliant
  implementation.
- **Faster Deployment:** Outsourcing accelerates implementation timelines, allowing
  quicker adoption.
- **Scalability:** Providers offer solutions that are already optimized for scalability
  and enterprise use cases.

**Challenges:**

- **Dependence on Vendor:** Organizations may rely on third-party support for maintenance
  and updates.
- **Cost (Short-Term):** Initial costs may be higher compared to building in-house.
- **Data Privacy Concerns:** If data residency or privacy laws are strict, organizations
  must ensure the vendor complies with regulatory requirements.

### How to Choose the Right Approach

1. **Assess Resources:**
    - Do you have skilled developers and cybersecurity experts in-house?
    - Is there sufficient bandwidth for the project?

2. **Evaluate Goals and Timelines:**
    - Is rapid implementation critical to meet business goals?
    - Do you need to demonstrate immediate ROI?

3. **Consider Security and Compliance:**
    - Can you meet regulatory and security standards independently?
    - Does the vendor provide compliance guarantees?

4. **Calculate Costs:** Compare the long-term costs of maintaining a DIY solution vs.
   ongoing vendor fees.

By carefully evaluating these factors, organizations can choose the approach that aligns
best with their strategic goals and operational capabilities.

## Read the full article